Gears Tactics is the latest grub smashing entry into the long-running Gears franchise. This time around however you'll be shaking the formula up with an XCOM style strategy mix rather than a cover to cover over the shoulder shooty game, and that brings a bit of a different angle (literally) in the way the game's performance works. Powered once again by the Unreal Engine 4 we see Gears Tactics take place before the events of even the first game and acts as a prequel to the entire series. But enough of the story, if you want those details you'll want to check out our Review where Chris gave it an 8.5.

Backing up to the graphics portion now. The game is powered by the ever evolving Unreal Engine 4 and is bringing some very interesting graphical options to the mix. There's the recurring dynamic resolution scaling ability that allows you to set a minimum framerate and the game will scale accordingly to try and keep you above that minimum. It works decently well so long as something like Temporal AA doesn't bother you and you're okay with a softer edged image. They did give you a new option to tackle a performance hit from within the lines with Variable Rate Shading (VRS), we'll get into that one towards the end. There are some really impactful options in this one revolving around reflections because of the nature of the camera in this game.

Gears Tactics makes use of Unreal Engine 4's support for Planar Reflections that are quite a bit better than Screen Space Reflections due to the fact that they can reflect objects that are just offscreen rather than simply those in the screen space. There is a cost to this and it is most certainly in the performance category. We did have this option enabled for all the testing, but disabling Planar Reflections and Glossy Reflections can result in noticeable performance improvement. That is something worth keeping in mind as you look over the results.

Minimum Desktop Spec

- OS - Windows 10 64-bit May 2019 Update

- CPU - Intel i3 6100/AMD FX-6000

- GPU - Radeon R7 260X/GeForce GTX 750 Ti

- VRAM - 2GB

- RAM - 8GB

- DirectX - DirectX 12

- HDD - 45GB

- Sound Card - DirectX Compatible

Recommended Desktop Spec

- OS- Windows 10 64-bit May 2019 Update

- CPU - Intel i5 8400/AMD Ryzen 3

- GPU - Radeon RX 570/GeForce GTX 970

- VRAM - 4GB

- RAM - 8GB

- DirectX - DirectX 12

- HDD - 45GB

- Sound Card - DirectX Compatible

Ideal Desktop Spec

- OS- Windows 10 64-bit May 2019 Update

- CPU - Intel i7 8700/AMD Ryzen 7

- GPU - AMD Radeon VII/GeForce RTX 2080

- VRAM - 8GB

- RAM - 16GB

- DirectX - DirectX 12

- HDD - SSD 45GB

- Sound Card - DirectX Compatible

Recommended Laptop Spec

- OS - Windows 10 64-bit May 2019 Update

- CPU - Intel i7 1065G7

- GPU - Intel Iris Plus

- VRAM - N/A

- RAM - 16GB

- DirectX - DirectX 12

- HDD - SSD 45GB

- Sound Card - DirectX Compatible

Testing Methodology

Gears Tactics comes packed with a very nice built-in benchmark utility that does a very good job replicating typical gameplay. There is a little bit of variance between the runs so it was imperative to have several in order to average them out to get an idea of where performance lies. As far as settings go we found that not all presets meant the same for each graphics card so we manually set everything to what we're calling the "Max" Setting for the testing. It is also important to note that a tactics game like this doesn't really benefit from high refresh rates in non-competitive scenarios outside of smoothing out the game since you're reaction speed and being able to spot small movements isn't key to winning.

Once we had the results from 3 runs, after discarding an initial burner run for loading purposes, we took the average of average frame rates as well as the 99th percentile results from the run. We report our performance metrics as average frames per second and have moved away from the 1% and .1% reporting and are now using the 99th percentile. For those uncertain of what the 99th percentile is, representing is easily explained as showing only 1 frame out of 100 is slower than this frame rate. Put another way, 99% of the frames will achieve at least this frame rate.

2 of 9

Test System

Components	Z370
CPU	Intel Core i9-9900k @ 5GHz
Memory	32GB Mushkin Redline DDR4 3600
Motherboard	EVGA Z370 Classified K
Storage	Kingston KC2000 1TB NVMe SSD
PSU	Cooler Master V1200 Platinum
Windows Version	Latest verion of windows at the time of testing
Hardware-Accelerated GPU Scheduling	On if supported by GPU and driver.

Graphics Cards Tested

GPU	Architecture	Core Count	Clock Speed	Memory Capacity	Memory Speed
NVIDIA RTX 2080ti FE	Turing	4352	1350/1635	11GB GDDR6	14Gbps
NVIDIA RTX 2080 SUPER FE	Turing	3072	1650/1815	8GB GDDR6	15.5Gbps
NVIDIA RTX 2070 SUPER FE	Turing	2560	1605/1770	8GB GDDR6	14Gbps
NVIDIA RTX 2060 SUPER	Turing	2176	1470/1650	8GB GDDR6	14Gbps
NVIDIA RTX 2060 FE	Turing	1904	1365/168	6GB GDDR6	14Gbps
ZOTAC Gaming GTX 1660	Turing	1408	1530/1785	6GB GDDR5	8Gbps
ZOTAC GTX 1650 SUPER	Turing	1280	1530/1725	4GB GDDR6	12Gbps
NVIDIA GTX 1080 FE	Pascal	2560	1607/1733	8GB GDDR5X	10Gbps
NVIDIA GTX 1070 FE	Pascal	1920	1506/1683	8GB GDDR5	8Gbps
NVIDIA GTX 1060 FE 6GB	Pascal	1280	1506/1708	6GB GDDR5	8Gbps
AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	Navi 10	2560	1605/1755/1905	8GB GDDR6	14Gbps
AMD Radeon RX 5700	Navi 10	2304	1465/1625/1725	8GB GDDR6	14Gbps
Sapphire RX 5600 XT Pulse	Navi 10	2304	1130/1660/1750	6GB GDDR6	14Gbps
AMD RX Vega 64	Vega 10	4096	1247/1546	8GB HBM2	945Mbps
AMD RX Vega 56	Vega 10	3584	1156/1471	8GB HBM2	800Mbs
Sapphire RX 5500 XT 4GB	Navi 14	1408	1737/1845	4GB GDDR6	14Gbps
MSI RX 580 Armor 8GB	Polaris 20	2304	1366	8GB GDDR5	8Gbps
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 4GB	Polaris 20	2048	1340	4GB GDDR5	7Gbps

Drivers Used

Drivers
Radeon Settings	20.4.2
GeForce	445.87

Preset Scaling At 4K

Testing presets at 4K gives us a couple of quick metrics before diving into the game too deeply. First off, it shows us how the game looks at various presets as well as how performance scales with those settings. Gears Tactics scales quite a bit visually and in performance between Low to High, but once you get to high the differences become much more subtle when going to Ultra or to our Max Preset we used for testing.

The Low Preset is generally quite ugly, but if you're on the lower end of the spectrum and don't care about the bells and whistles you'll be able to push into some really playable framerates on a potato, I was able to play this one at 720p Low and stay over 30 FPS on a 15w Ice Lake CPU (will get into that one in a later review). Medium really cleans the image up, so if you're having issues getting good performance on older hardware maybe give this one a go and couple dynamic resolution in the mix.

Low Preset

Medium Preset

High Preset

Ultra Preset

UHD 4K Preset Scaling 9900k + RTX 2080 Ti

AVG FPS

99th Percentile

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

Low 181

100

Medium 123

84

High 73

66

Ultra 55

50

We recently added in this section as a representation of what to expect in scaling at 1080p. We went with the more entry level Radeon card on this one to offer up a bit of contrast to the GeForce powered 4K testing.

HD 1080p Preset Scaling

AVG FPS

99th Percentile

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Low 210

147

Medium 134

79

High 80

72

Ultra 64

59

Intel Core Scaling Performance

While this test won’t tell just how many cores and threads the game can and will use, it does show how the game performs as you move up in cores and threads available. These were tested at the 1080p resolution using the Ultra Preset while pairing the CPU with the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition. While this does not take into account the cache difference you would see with Intel CPUs as you move through their offering stack it does give us a better idea of how the game benefits and behaves from more cores and threads.

Note: The additional GPU Bound Percentage is based on the percent of the GPU that was in use as reported by the in-game benchmark results screen.

Core i9-9900K Core and Thread Scaling

AVG FPS

99th Percentile

GPU Bound Percentage

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

8c/16t 137

108

92

8c/8t 138

106

90

6c/12t 138

99

88

6c/6t 140

95

90

4c/8t 125

82

80

4c/4t 128

79

80

2c/4t 106

55

78

2c/2t 78

26

67

Graphics Card Results

1080p

Standard 1080p Max Settings Performance

AVG FPS

99th Percentile

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

RTX 2080 Ti FE 130

99

RTX 2080 SUPER 117

93

RX 5700 XT 100

92

RTX 2070 SUPER 100

82

RX 5700 92

85

RX 5600 XT 89

81

RTX 2060 SUPER 88

74

RX Vega 64 87

76

RTX 2060 FE 82

72

GTX 1080 FE 81

66

RX Vega 56 79

71

GTX 1070 FE 72

58

GTX 1660 62

57

RX 5500 XT 4GB 59

55

GTX 1650 SUPER 58

53

RX 580 8GB 52

48

GTX 1060 6GB FE 52

47

RX 570 4GB 47

43

Ultrawide 1080p

Ultrawide 1080p Max Settings Performance

AVG FPS

99th Percentile

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

RTX 2080 Ti FE 109

89

RTX 2080 SUPER 88

77

RTX 2070 SUPER 80

68

RX 5700 XT 78

71

RTX 2060 SUPER 73

63

RX 5700 68

62

RX Vega 64 67

59

RX 5600 XT 63

59

RTX 2060 FE 61

53

RX Vega 56 60

55

GTX 1080 FE 59

51

GTX 1070 FE 54

50

GTX 1660 47

43

RX 5500 XT 4GB 44

42

GTX 1650 SUPER 44

40

RX 580 8GB 41

38

GTX 1060 6GB FE 38

35

RX 570 4GB 36

32

1440p

Standard 1440p Max Settings Performance

AVG FPS

99th Percentile

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

RTX 2080 Ti FE 90

81

RTX 2080 SUPER 82

71

RTX 2070 SUPER 70

63

RX 5700 XT 66

62

RX 5700 61

57

RTX 2060 SUPER 60

55

RX 5600 XT 57

54

RX Vega 64 57

52

RTX 2060 FE 54

48

GTX 1080 FE 53

49

RX Vega 56 49

45

GTX 1070 FE 46

39

GTX 1660 39

35

RX 5500 XT 4GB 38

36

GTX 1650 SUPER 37

33

RX 580 8GB 34

30

GTX 1060 6GB FE 34

31

RX 570 4GB 32

30

Ultrawide 1440p

Ultrawide 1440p Max Settings Performance

AVG FPS

99th Percentile

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

RTX 2080 Ti FE 76

68

RTX 2080 SUPER 65

59

RTX 2070 SUPER 59

54

RX 5700 XT 49

46

RTX 2060 SUPER 47

43

RX 5700 45

42

RTX 2060 FE 43

40

GTX 1080 FE 43

37

RX 5600 XT 42

40

RX Vega 64 41

36

RX Vega 56 38

36

GTX 1070 FE 35

29

GTX 1660 31

27

RX 5500 XT 4GB 31

29

GTX 1650 SUPER 29

25

RX 580 8GB 26

25

GTX 1060 6GB FE 25

23

RX 570 4GB 25

23

UHD 4K

UHD 4K Max Settings Performance

AVG FPS

99th Percentile

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

RTX 2080 Ti FE 48

44

RTX 2080 SUPER 41

38

RTX 2070 SUPER 37

34

RX 5700 XT 33

31

RTX 2060 SUPER 30

27

RX 5700 29

27

RX 5600 XT 27

25

RTX 2060 FE 27

25

GTX 1080 FE 26

24

RX Vega 64 26

23

RX Vega 56 25

23

GTX 1070 FE 23

20

GTX 1660 21

20

GTX 1650 SUPER 20

19

RX 5500 XT 4GB 19

18

RX 580 8GB 17

16

GTX 1060 6GB FE 16

14

RX 570 4GB 16

14

Variable Rate Shading Performance Impact

Variable Rate Shading, first introduced to the market with the GeForce RTX line of graphics cards,received its own API thanks to Microsoft's efforts as revealed at the latest Game Developers Conference. It has also received support and implementation on the latest 10th Gen Ice Lake iGPU from Intel and will be part of the key components of their Xe architecture. Radeon will also be bringing support with their next-generation RDNA2 based GPUs as the Xbox Series X also supports VRS.

Variable Rate Shading is a technique that allows game developers to selectively reduce the shading rate in certain areas of the frame where there isn't much going on, thus improving the performance. Additionally, developers also have the option to do the opposite, to increase the shading rate in the areas that matter the most, thus improving visual quality there.

The first game to support this feature was Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus,which got it via patch last November. But, the big kicker with Gears Tactics is that it was available on day one and in the DX12 API rather than Vulkan. I will say before looking over the images and the results are that it is quite aggressive, but manages to claw back quite a bit of performance.

VRS Off

VRS On

VRS Performance

Link to full-size comparison here.

While you can get an idea in the images above here's a very zoomed in cut from each one showing what is going on in a very isolated section. This showcases the impact on the shading going on displaying that the impact while turned 'On' is clearly there it's much harder to discern while playing than 'Performance' as that mode is very aggressive and impacts the visuals greatly. If this were a fast-moving action shooter or racer I don't think it'd be that noticeable, but you're generally not moving quickly in this game so you'll likely notice it.

Left OFF, Center ON, Right Performance

1080p Maximum Settings Variable Rate Shading Average FPS

VRS OFF

VRS ON

VRS Performance

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

RTX 2080 Ti FE 130

141

149

RTX 2080 SUPER 117

125

134

RTX 2070 SUPER 100

107

116

RTX 2060 SUPER 88

96

106

RTX 2060 FE 82

87

97

GTX 1660 62

66

71

GTX 1650 SUPER 58

62

66

And claw back performance it does! Although the Performance settings is a bit too aggressive in my opinion. Simply turning VRS to ON will effectively jump your Turing based GPU up a rung in the performance category. This could allow you to turn on those gorgeous Planar Reflections and mitigate the impact a bit. The big difference here for me is that while Dynamic Resolution can maintain the shader integrity this can maintain the resolution crispness, it'll be up to you which is more valuable to retain for yourself. But, it is nice to see this feature making its way into more games and become available at launch in one of the most widely used game engines.

Conclusion

Truthfully Gears Tactics is a bit of a booger to squeeze out super high framerates while having the settings turned up. Seeing some of the 1080p focused cards fall below that 60 FPS line is a bit disappointing on the surface until you take a few things into account. The first being that we hit these cards with everything the game has to offer, and it has a lot. So simply dialing the details back even slightly will net you very nice performance increases. So you'll want to decide what shiny stuff you want to keep, and even if you want to keep it all you can turn on that Dynamic Resolution and go to town.

The other consideration is simply the type of game you've got there. I'm likely to be gunned down for saying this, but if you can hold over 45 FPS you're going to be in for a good time here. Gears Tactics isn't a twitchy style game at all. It's all about careful planning and pacing. This makes it the kind of game you're going to want to push the detail settings up in because you're going to be spending a lot of time looking at the scenes.

There are enough options here to tweak the game to get your desired performance and all of them can be done on the fly without the need to restart the game. One of my favorite options is the ability to turn on certain features just in the cutscenes where they will really pop but can get lost in the fray of the gameplay, might be worth a check if you want it super pretty for the exposition but don't want to lose a frame during the explosion! Time for me to Smash One Grub and get back to see how this storyline unfolds.