yitit
Home
/
Hardware
/
Intel’s Next-Gen 10nm Ice Lake-SP CPU Tested, Dual 28 Cores & 56 Threads Chips Compared To A Single AMD EPYC 7742 64 Core CPU
Intel’s Next-Gen 10nm Ice Lake-SP CPU Tested, Dual 28 Cores & 56 Threads Chips Compared To A Single AMD EPYC 7742 64 Core CPU-February 2024
Feb 13, 2026 2:14 AM

The latest benchmarks of Intel's next-generation Ice Lake-SP Xeon CPU server family have leaked out and they show some interesting results when compared to AMD's current generation 3rd Gen EPYC Rome CPUs.

Intel's Next-Gen 10nm Ice Lake-SP CPUs Tested, Two Chips With 28 Cores and 56 Threads Each Against A Single AMD EPYC Rome 64 Core Flagship

As part of the Whitley platform, the Intel Ice Lake-SP CPU lineup will be composed of several Xeon chips. We have already seen 6 core and 24 core parts but the latest one is a 28 core part and has been spotted by TUM_APISAK in the Geekbench database and Momomo_US too in the SiSoftware database.

The Intel Ice Lake-SP CPU was tested on a dual-socket server and features two of the chips. Each chip features 28 cores and 56 threads which round up to 56 cores and 112 threads in total. Since the chip is still an early engineering sample, it features lower clock speeds of 1.5 GHz base and up to 3.20 GHz boost clocks. The CPU features 42 MB of L3 and 35 MB of L2 cache for a total of 77 MB cache. The 2S Ice Lake-SP server was equipped with 512 GB of memory which should be clocked at 3200 MHz and featured in an 8-channel configuration which is one of the key highlights of the new Whitley platform.

The performance of the 2S Intel Ice Lake-SP server was evaluated within Geekbench 4 which does benefit from the AVX-512 instruction set featured on Intel's current & upcoming Xeon CPU families. In single-core tests, the server scored up to 3443 points and in multi-core tests, the chip scored up to 37317 points.

intel-ice-lake-sp-10nm-xeon-cpu_28-core-56-thread_2s-platform_performance-benchmark_2

intel-ice-lake-sp-10nm-xeon-cpu_28-core-56-thread_2s-platform_performance-benchmark_1

intel-ice-lake-sp-10nm-xeon-cpu_28-core-56-thread_2s-platform_performance-benchmark_4

intel-ice-lake-sp-10nm-xeon-cpu_28-core-56-thread_2s-platform_performance-benchmark_3

2 of 9

Before we compare it to the AMD EPYC 7742, it should be pointed that both of these test results are based on early engineering samples with lower clock speeds so final performance is expected to be much better. However, at the same time, the Intel CPUs benefit in this benchmark from their AVX-512 instruction set which the AMD CPUs lack. The entries are also shown in different operating system environments though the EPYC 7742 CPU was in fact tested on a Windows 10 server setup, Geekbench isn't reporting it correctly. Regardless of that, let's see how the two 28 core Ice Lake-SP Xeon CPUs stack against a single AMD EPYC 7742 CPU.

We used a single EPYC 7742 entry for comparison so we are comparing a total of 64 cores and 128 threads from AMD against 56 cores and 112 threads from Intel. The AMD EPYC 7742 CPU easily out performs the Intel chips in single-core tests which is due to the higher base clock speeds of 3.4 GHz versus 1.5 GHz on the Intel parts. At the same time, the AMD platform delivers around 35000 multi-core points which are slightly lower than the Intel Ice Lake-SP parts. With final clock speeds, the Ice Lake-SP CPUs can easily outperform the AMD EPYC Rome parts but the lead may not be as big as Intel had hoped for.

It obviously looks like Intel's Ice Lake-SP was more of an EPYC Rome competitor which missed its initial schedule due to poor 10nm yields and now has to compete against AMD's EPYC Milan that is just around the corner. We will wait to see some more test and performance results for Ice Lake-SP CPUs in non-AVX 512 optimized workloads but every benchmark leak makes it very clear that Ice Lake-SP is late and AMD isn't going to make things any better for Intel.

And it also just isn't about the performance metrics, we still don't know the prices and power efficiency of Ice Lake-SP yet but we do know that the existing EPYC Rome lineup has far lower prices and TCO than the Cascade Lake-SP lineup and that is expected to remain intact even when Ice Lake-SP ships.

Intel Xeon CPU Families (Preliminary):

Family BrandingDiamond RapidsClearwater ForestGranite RapidsSierra ForestEmerald RapidsSapphire RapidsIce Lake-SPCooper Lake-SPCascade Lake-SP/APSkylake-SP
Process NodeIntel 20A?Intel 18AIntel 3Intel 3Intel 7Intel 710nm+14nm++14nm++14nm+
Platform NameIntel Mountain Stream
Intel Birch Stream
Intel Mountain Stream
Intel Birch Stream
Intel Mountain Stream
Intel Birch Stream
Intel Mountain Stream
Intel Birch Stream
Intel Eagle StreamIntel Eagle StreamIntel WhitleyIntel Cedar IslandIntel PurleyIntel Purley
Core ArchitectureLion Cove?Crestmont+Redwood CoveSierra GlenRaptor CoveGolden CoveSunny CoveCascade LakeCascade LakeSkylake
MCP (Multi-Chip Package) SKUsYesTBDYesYesYesYesNoNoYesNo
SocketLGA 4677 / 7529LGA 4677 / 7529LGA 4677 / 7529LGA 4677 / 7529LGA 4677LGA 4677LGA 4189LGA 4189LGA 3647LGA 3647
Max Core CountUp To 144?Up To 288Up To 136?Up To 288Up To 64?Up To 56Up To 40Up To 28Up To 28Up To 28
Max Thread CountUp To 288?Up To 288Up To 272?Up To 288Up To 128Up To 112Up To 80Up To 56Up To 56Up To 56
Max L3 CacheTBDTBDTBD108 MB L3320 MB L3105 MB L360 MB L338.5 MB L338.5 MB L338.5 MB L3
Memory SupportUp To 12-Channel DDR6-7200?TBDUp To 12-Channel DDR5-6400Up To 8-Channel DDR5-6400?Up To 8-Channel DDR5-5600Up To 8-Channel DDR5-4800Up To 8-Channel DDR4-3200Up To 6-Channel DDR4-3200DDR4-2933 6-ChannelDDR4-2666 6-Channel
PCIe Gen SupportPCIe 6.0 (128 Lanes)?TBDPCIe 5.0 (136 Lanes)PCIe 5.0 (TBD Lanes)PCIe 5.0 (80 Lanes)PCIe 5.0 (80 lanes)PCIe 4.0 (64 Lanes)PCIe 3.0 (48 Lanes)PCIe 3.0 (48 Lanes)PCIe 3.0 (48 Lanes)
TDP Range (PL1)Up To 500W?TBDUp To 500WUp To 350WUp To 350WUp To 350W105-270W150W-250W165W-205W140W-205W
3D Xpoint Optane DIMMDonahue Pass?TBDDonahue PassTBDCrow PassCrow PassBarlow PassBarlow PassApache PassN/A
CompetitionAMD EPYC VeniceAMD EPYC Zen 5CAMD EPYC TurinAMD EPYC BergamoAMD EPYC Genoa ~5nmAMD EPYC Genoa ~5nmAMD EPYC Milan 7nm+AMD EPYC Rome 7nmAMD EPYC Rome 7nmAMD EPYC Naples 14nm
Launch2025?202520242024202320222021202020182017

Comments
Welcome to yitit comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Login to display more comments
Hardware
Recent News
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.yitit.com All Rights Reserved