Is there a better alternative?

While the desktop FDM printing market definitely has plenty of competition, the Pulse line stands out across the board. The base model Pulse goes toe-to-toe with the Original Prusa i3 MK3/S, but comes away with the advantages of many more options for customization, as well as a shorter lead time.

　　Meanwhile, the Pulse XE can be considered a competitor to Lulzbot’s Taz line, and other true performance printers. In that case, the Lulzbot has an edge on build volume, but the Pulse XE’s out-of-the-box ability to print with some of the highest performance materials on the market with no need for modification or additional components, magnetic bed, and somewhat lower cost mean it remains an attractive option.

　　

How long will it last?

One of the biggest advantages of open-source built 3D printers such as these is that their future lifespan is more or less infinite. Both motherboards used in the Pulse run commonly used, widely supported firmware systems that speak a common protocol that has been standard in the 3D printing community for years. One benefit of the Pulse line, specifically, is its reliance on MatterControl means further updates of even more advanced features are likely in the pipeline, and support for the product will be readily available for years to come.

　　

Should you buy it?

Do you want to work with the best, without any fuss? If so, absolutely! Otherwise, still yeah! This thing is great!